Quora Feeds
Active Member
Shriram Krishnamurthi
I can't speak authoritatively about undergraduate university admissions committees. I haven't worked on one. However, they do sometimes ask for faculty input in judging a student's proclaimed expertise. This is something where taking a MOOC can potentially make a difference.
However, most faculty are, I think, quite jaded about MOOCs now. As the stats show, the vast majority of students only sign up for MOOCs; more of them watch the MOOC (assuming there are videos, which most have); few of them do any substantial work; and very few actually finish anything. And even if they claim to have finished one, there are questions of authenticity.
Therefore, only some form of validated credential that demonstrates completion is going to matter. I have not kept up with the MOOC scene to know what form that would take (so please don't ask me questions about specific providers and specific schemes — I don't know (or care)). Anything that can't be attested to a person is going to viewed with suspicion (because who wouldn't want to pay someone to do a MOOC in their name to help them get into a place like Brown?). And someone who merely lists a lot of MOOCs without showing any real completion is going to be viewed at best as a dilettante. As a faculty member I would have no respect for that (indeed, the contrary), but it's possible an impressionable, idealistic admissions committee member might be more taken in by that—but I very much doubt it. Admissions committee members at an elite university have seen every trick in the book and a few not even on the books. I should hope they pretty quickly get at least a little jaded.
I wonder what someone like Parke Muth has to say. (-:
See Questions On Quora
Continue reading...
I can't speak authoritatively about undergraduate university admissions committees. I haven't worked on one. However, they do sometimes ask for faculty input in judging a student's proclaimed expertise. This is something where taking a MOOC can potentially make a difference.
However, most faculty are, I think, quite jaded about MOOCs now. As the stats show, the vast majority of students only sign up for MOOCs; more of them watch the MOOC (assuming there are videos, which most have); few of them do any substantial work; and very few actually finish anything. And even if they claim to have finished one, there are questions of authenticity.
Therefore, only some form of validated credential that demonstrates completion is going to matter. I have not kept up with the MOOC scene to know what form that would take (so please don't ask me questions about specific providers and specific schemes — I don't know (or care)). Anything that can't be attested to a person is going to viewed with suspicion (because who wouldn't want to pay someone to do a MOOC in their name to help them get into a place like Brown?). And someone who merely lists a lot of MOOCs without showing any real completion is going to be viewed at best as a dilettante. As a faculty member I would have no respect for that (indeed, the contrary), but it's possible an impressionable, idealistic admissions committee member might be more taken in by that—but I very much doubt it. Admissions committee members at an elite university have seen every trick in the book and a few not even on the books. I should hope they pretty quickly get at least a little jaded.
I wonder what someone like Parke Muth has to say. (-:
See Questions On Quora
Continue reading...